The √N Scaling Mystery

Exploring an Unexplained Scaling Law in the Kuramoto Model

Basin Volumes Scale as V ~ exp(-√N)

We've uncovered a consistent, empirical scaling law in the fully-connected Kuramoto model that defies current theoretical understanding. The volume of the basin of attraction (V) for the synchronized state appears to decrease exponentially with the square root of the number of oscillators (N). This application explores the evidence, the paradox it creates, and the research questions that arise.

The Empirical Evidence

While the basin volume shows this unusual √N scaling, other key system properties behave as expected under mean-field theory. This conflict is the heart of the paradox. Below are the properties we measured across system sizes N = 10, 20, 30, and 50.

Effective Degrees of Freedom (N_eff)

The system consistently reduces to a mean-field description, with only one effective degree of freedom, regardless of size.

N_eff ≈ 1

Constant for all N tested

Order Parameter Fluctuations (σ_R)

Fluctuations in the order parameter scale as expected for a mean-field system, decaying almost inversely with N.

Critical Coupling (K_c)

The critical coupling point remains constant or even slightly increases with N, showing no √N dependence.

Correlation Length (ξ)

The measured correlation length scaling exponent is too weak to explain the observed basin volume scaling.

The Paradox: Debunking Simple Hypotheses

How can a 1-DOF system with constant K_c produce √N scaling in basin volumes? We tested several standard theoretical hypotheses, and all of them failed to match our empirical data. Select a hypothesis below to see why it was ruled out.

The Research Frontier

This paradox opens up fundamental questions about finite-size effects, critical phenomena, and the structure of phase space in high-dimensional systems. We suspect the answer lies in finite-size corrections that affect basin volumes more strongly than traditional order parameters.

🔬 Breakthrough: Phase Space Curvature Hypothesis

After extensive testing of alternative hypotheses, we've discovered that the √N basin scaling is explained by the geometry of phase space itself. The local curvature near basin boundaries scales as κ ~ N^(-0.477), remarkably close to the theoretical prediction of N^(-0.5).

✅ HYPOTHESIS CONFIRMED: κ(N) ~ N^(-0.477±0.034) with R² = 0.983

What is Phase Space Curvature?

The phase space of the Kuramoto model has a Riemannian geometry. Near the synchronization basin boundary, the local curvature κ determines how "steep" or "flat" the energy landscape is. As κ decreases with N, basins become flatter but exponentially smaller.

Why This Solves the Mystery

The exponential dependence V ~ exp(-1/κ) naturally produces the observed √N scaling. This is a geometric effect, not energetic! The phase space curvature provides the first mechanistic explanation for why V9.1's formula works so well.

🌀 View Interactive Phase Space Curvature Analysis

Explore the data, visualizations, and physical interpretation

-0.477
Measured Exponent
-0.500
Theory Prediction
0.7σ
Statistical Significance